<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Popes and Papacy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/?feed=comments-" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress</link>
	<description>The Popes and Papacy Blog by Anura Guruge</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 05:58:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lord (Papabile) Ouellet May Become &#8220;I Lied&#8221; O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s Latest Victim. U.S. Cardinals Want Witch Hunt. by Anura Guruge</title>
		<link>http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/lord-papabile-ouellet-may-become-i-lied-obriens-latest-victim-bl-lombardi-lectures-the-cardinals-u-s-cardinals-want-wicth-hunt/comment-page-1/#comment-7588</link>
		<dc:creator>Anura Guruge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 05:58:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/?p=11653#comment-7588</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are right. Thank you. I misread it. It was close to 1am and I interpreted that that was his answer to the cardinals when pressed about O&#039;Brien questions. I fixed it. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right. Thank you. I misread it. It was close to 1am and I interpreted that that was his answer to the cardinals when pressed about O&#8217;Brien questions. I fixed it. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Lord (Papabile) Ouellet May Become &#8220;I Lied&#8221; O&#8217;Brien&#8217;s Latest Victim. U.S. Cardinals Want Witch Hunt. by robertt</title>
		<link>http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/lord-papabile-ouellet-may-become-i-lied-obriens-latest-victim-bl-lombardi-lectures-the-cardinals-u-s-cardinals-want-wicth-hunt/comment-page-1/#comment-7587</link>
		<dc:creator>robertt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 2013 02:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/?p=11653#comment-7587</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nowhere in the Irish Times piece does it state, infer, or otherwise indicate that Lombardi was talking to Cardinals when he made this statement. In fact, given the way it is phrased, (&quot;we are here to talk about today&#039;s congregation of cardinals) it seems more likely that he was talking to a member of the press since he is the Vatican spokesman.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nowhere in the Irish Times piece does it state, infer, or otherwise indicate that Lombardi was talking to Cardinals when he made this statement. In fact, given the way it is phrased, (&#8220;we are here to talk about today&#8217;s congregation of cardinals) it seems more likely that he was talking to a member of the press since he is the Vatican spokesman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on With My 2011 #1, Lord Ouellet Suffering Setback Thanks To &#8220;I Lied&#8221; O&#8217;Brien, My 2009 #1, Odilo Pedro Scherer Is Now The Flavor Of The Week. by impac65</title>
		<link>http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/with-my-2011-1-lord-ouellet-suffering-setback-thanks-to-i-lied-obrien-my-2009-1-odilo-pedro-scherer-is-now-the-flavor-of-the-week/comment-page-1/#comment-7585</link>
		<dc:creator>impac65</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Mar 2013 22:06:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/?p=11678#comment-7585</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Anu


I agree with you that this is crazy doings in Rome.  Those 5 cardinals had 22 days to get themselves to Rome. Them not being present is a direct plan to delay. Since all 115 electors are not in Rome the conclave cannot be moved up earlier from the 15th, if I understood the Motu correct. And even though he disgusts me, O&#039;Brien does not get to choose not to attend, he&#039;s required like you said. The only reason a cardinal can&#039;t attend is being sick. And they make it like there&#039;s going to be a cardinal on his death bed that can&#039;t make it to the Sistine Chapel, but is still able to travel to Rome. Is there really anybody that sick under 80? It seems like that rule was made when they wheeled in 100 year olds. . If somebody is that &quot;sick&quot; why are they even coming? And the one cardinal that&#039;s sick is claiming he can&#039;t come because of bad eyesight.  Can&#039;t he just come and stgay in his room, and use this chalice we keep hearing about and let those 3 infirmi do their job.
     When you are made a cardinal it means to elect a pope. Nothing else. There should be 117 of them in this upcoming conclave. We may be disgusted by O&#039;Brien and others but when they don&#039;t attend that&#039;s the beginning of the election being tainted. I&#039;m so sick of all the excuses.  And the cardinal with the bad eyesight should have had a private jet hired from the mega rich Catholic church to bring him. 
    Maybe in the future when a cardinal becomes sick, and he&#039;s not going to get better he shouldn&#039;t be an elector anymore. This guy&#039;s eyesight didn&#039;t just go bad last week. And OBrien molested priests in the 80&#039;s and decided to quit last week. Sounds like a Brinks truck got backed up to his doorstep, and, he suddenly got a conscience.
     Its like a Michael Jackson death, or a Manti T&#039;eo story. It&#039;s gonna have a lot more twists and turns before it&#039;s over. Somebody wants to claim the election was done wrong after the fact. It&#039;s like the 1919 Black Sox. But so obvious its funny. That guy Lombardi is so bad, and the cardinals just keep letting it happen.

Jim K]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anu</p>
<p>I agree with you that this is crazy doings in Rome.  Those 5 cardinals had 22 days to get themselves to Rome. Them not being present is a direct plan to delay. Since all 115 electors are not in Rome the conclave cannot be moved up earlier from the 15th, if I understood the Motu correct. And even though he disgusts me, O&#8217;Brien does not get to choose not to attend, he&#8217;s required like you said. The only reason a cardinal can&#8217;t attend is being sick. And they make it like there&#8217;s going to be a cardinal on his death bed that can&#8217;t make it to the Sistine Chapel, but is still able to travel to Rome. Is there really anybody that sick under 80? It seems like that rule was made when they wheeled in 100 year olds. . If somebody is that &#8220;sick&#8221; why are they even coming? And the one cardinal that&#8217;s sick is claiming he can&#8217;t come because of bad eyesight.  Can&#8217;t he just come and stgay in his room, and use this chalice we keep hearing about and let those 3 infirmi do their job.<br />
     When you are made a cardinal it means to elect a pope. Nothing else. There should be 117 of them in this upcoming conclave. We may be disgusted by O&#8217;Brien and others but when they don&#8217;t attend that&#8217;s the beginning of the election being tainted. I&#8217;m so sick of all the excuses.  And the cardinal with the bad eyesight should have had a private jet hired from the mega rich Catholic church to bring him.<br />
    Maybe in the future when a cardinal becomes sick, and he&#8217;s not going to get better he shouldn&#8217;t be an elector anymore. This guy&#8217;s eyesight didn&#8217;t just go bad last week. And OBrien molested priests in the 80&#8242;s and decided to quit last week. Sounds like a Brinks truck got backed up to his doorstep, and, he suddenly got a conscience.<br />
     Its like a Michael Jackson death, or a Manti T&#8217;eo story. It&#8217;s gonna have a lot more twists and turns before it&#8217;s over. Somebody wants to claim the election was done wrong after the fact. It&#8217;s like the 1919 Black Sox. But so obvious its funny. That guy Lombardi is so bad, and the cardinals just keep letting it happen.</p>
<p>Jim K</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Possible Inconsistencies In Today&#8217;s Normas nonnullas Motu Proprio To Conclave Rules! by Anura Guruge</title>
		<link>http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/possible-inconsistencies-in-todays-normas-nonnullas-motu-proprio-to-conclave-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-7572</link>
		<dc:creator>Anura Guruge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 15:30:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/?p=11410#comment-7572</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Possible Inconsistencies In Today&#8217;s Normas nonnullas Motu Proprio To Conclave Rules! by Cristiano</title>
		<link>http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/possible-inconsistencies-in-todays-normas-nonnullas-motu-proprio-to-conclave-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-7569</link>
		<dc:creator>Cristiano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2013 12:17:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/?p=11410#comment-7569</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I still think that it´s about the run-off... The new #35 says that no Cardinal elector can be excluded. The 2007 m.t. says in #75 that the two Cardinals involved in the run-off can´t vote. That would be a contradiction. Don´t you think it makes sense?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think that it´s about the run-off&#8230; The new #35 says that no Cardinal elector can be excluded. The 2007 m.t. says in #75 that the two Cardinals involved in the run-off can´t vote. That would be a contradiction. Don´t you think it makes sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Would YOU Like To See As The Next Pope? What Name Should He Select? by Doris</title>
		<link>http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/who-would-you-like-to-see-as-the-next-pope-what-name-should-he-select/comment-page-2/#comment-7544</link>
		<dc:creator>Doris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 23:14:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/?p=11259#comment-7544</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Next Pope should be named Pope Robertum Martinis (Latin) Robert Martin 1st]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Next Pope should be named Pope Robertum Martinis (Latin) Robert Martin 1st</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Peter The Roman&#8217;: Post Your Excuses Here (For Easy Reference Next Month). by Anura Guruge</title>
		<link>http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/peter-the-roman-post-your-excuses-here-for-easy-reference-next-month/comment-page-1/#comment-7543</link>
		<dc:creator>Anura Guruge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:22:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/?p=11274#comment-7543</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Funny though with your elections and all. Just crazy times in Italy, especially Rome. Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny though with your elections and all. Just crazy times in Italy, especially Rome. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on &#8216;Peter The Roman&#8217;: Post Your Excuses Here (For Easy Reference Next Month). by Kieran</title>
		<link>http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/peter-the-roman-post-your-excuses-here-for-easy-reference-next-month/comment-page-1/#comment-7540</link>
		<dc:creator>Kieran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 22:07:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/?p=11274#comment-7540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Peter the Roman...Cardinal Comastri studied at the Pontifical ROMAN Seminary and is currently Archpriest of St Peter&#039;s Basilica and President of the Fabric of St Peter.....PETRUS ROMANUS??&#039;  Although I actually believe the &quot;Prophecies&quot; of St Malachy to be 16th century forgeries.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peter the Roman&#8230;Cardinal Comastri studied at the Pontifical ROMAN Seminary and is currently Archpriest of St Peter&#8217;s Basilica and President of the Fabric of St Peter&#8230;..PETRUS ROMANUS??&#8217;  Although I actually believe the &#8220;Prophecies&#8221; of St Malachy to be 16th century forgeries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Who Would YOU Like To See As The Next Pope? What Name Should He Select? by Anura Guruge</title>
		<link>http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/who-would-you-like-to-see-as-the-next-pope-what-name-should-he-select/comment-page-2/#comment-7537</link>
		<dc:creator>Anura Guruge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 21:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/?p=11259#comment-7537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Possible Inconsistencies In Today&#8217;s Normas nonnullas Motu Proprio To Conclave Rules! by Anura Guruge</title>
		<link>http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/possible-inconsistencies-in-todays-normas-nonnullas-motu-proprio-to-conclave-rules/comment-page-1/#comment-7532</link>
		<dc:creator>Anura Guruge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2013 20:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://popes-and-papacy.com/wordpress/?p=11410#comment-7532</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Louis,
Is it TOO MUCH to ask YOU to go through the new m.p. and find the errors. I found one. Out all morning. Just got back. Cheers. Anura]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Louis,<br />
Is it TOO MUCH to ask YOU to go through the new m.p. and find the errors. I found one. Out all morning. Just got back. Cheers. Anura</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
