…by Anura Guruge
One Related Post of many:
To The St. Malachy Prophecy and Pope Peter The Roman Proponents — May 16, 2010.
So the question is whether Benedict XVI (#266) is ‘Peter the Roman’?
Note, that ‘Peter the Roman‘ is a figurative term such as the use of the word ‘Babylon‘ to refer to Rome in the Book of Revelations. Lets face it, ‘Peter the Roman’ is not exactly a valid papal name (though, yes, a pope with his near infinite and absolute powers could opt to be known as such). Plus, please note, that the prophecies are already out of sequence! Furthermore, even the so called experts agree that they can’t predict when this last prophecy will kick in. That it will apply to the next pope is a fallacy. Basically, there is no indication as to which papacy it will apply, especially given the sequencing errors at the start.
Let us read the prophecy again:
Lets face it, however much the Vatican tries to sugarcoat it this has been an incredible period of tribulation for the pope. Period. It doesn’t matter whether the pope visits Milan or Lord Ouellet lights up Dublin. The headlines continue to scream: Vatileaks, sex abuse, Gotti Tedeschi, Ms. Emanuela Orlandi, Enrico De Pedis and U.S. nuns.
It sure looks like THIS POPE, Benedict XVI (#266), is feeding his flock through many tribulations.
Then turn to the financial mess in Europe. Spain is ready to implode. Italy is next. Sure sounds like the walls could come crashing down on Rome.
So, give it some thought. ‘Peter the Roman’ might already be in the Vatican. Period.