Apr 222012
This had been on my mind all along, especially once I found out that Grand Inquisitor Sartain is a proven accessory. [To be honest, each time I see his name, the embedded name within it just screams out at me! Scary.] So, it was serendipitous that I found this article in one of my more favored U.S. publications (one that I actually sometimes even purchase). Hallelujah. Thank YOU.
Click image to access excellent "Boston Globe" opinion piece.
One Response to “What Is Better “Radical Feminist Themes” Or Clerical Sex Abuse? Vatican Has Its Say.”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
While there is such a thing as radical feminism, the Church uses it, similar to Limbaugh’s ridiculous usage of, when used appropriately, great term “feminazi”, in an outrageous manner. When I think radical feminism/feminazi I do not think positions the Church is attacking the US nuns for (mandatory celibacy, female priests, gay rights and birth control/abortion) but rather the misandrist ideology of Steinem, McKinnon, Daly, Dworkin and others whose heyday was 70s and 80s. And their attitudes toward sex are much closer to the Catholic Church (they are both against it as a rule and can accept in as a necessary evil only in very narrowly circumscribed circumstances) that they are to positions advocated by LCWR or Sandra Fluke.